Charge Sheet and Framing of Charges in Bangladesh Criminal Cases (2026)

Framing of charges Bangladesh courts carry out: the 2026 position

Framing of charges Bangladesh criminal courts carry out is the point at which an accusation becomes a trial. Until the charge is framed, the accused faces a police report or a complaint; once it is framed, the accused faces a formal, written accusation by the court itself, a plea is taken and the prosecution starts calling witnesses. Everything that follows is measured against that charge. It is also the last point at which an accused can ask the trial court to end the case without a trial.

This guide explains the whole stage: the difference between a charge sheet and a charge, the content rules in sections 221 to 224 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1898, discharge under sections 241A and 265C, joinder, alteration under section 227, how an order framing charge is challenged, the statutory timelines, and what the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act 2026 did and did not change. It is written for accused persons, complainants, corporate victims and their advisers.

Summary: After investigation, the police submit a charge sheet; the court then hears the prosecution and the defence and either discharges the accused or frames a written charge. A Magistrate discharges where the charge is groundless under section 241A; a Court of Session discharges where there is no sufficient ground for proceeding under section 265C. A charge must state the offence, the law and section, and enough particulars to give the accused notice. No appeal lies against an order framing charge, so the remedies are revision and, in exceptional cases, section 561A.

Key point: The superior courts expect the accused to apply for discharge under section 241A or section 265C before seeking quashment, and they test an order framing charge only for a prima facie case on the prosecution's materials. The charge hearing is where the defence must put its best legal points, not something to save for the High Court Division.

At a glance

Swipe or scroll →

Table of Contents

What framing of charges Bangladesh law requires, and why it matters

A charge is the court's formal statement of the offence the accused must answer. It is not the charge sheet. The charge sheet is the police report forwarded under section 173 of the Code once investigation is complete, setting out the parties, the information received and the persons acquainted with the facts, together with the documents and the section 161 witness statements on which the prosecution relies.[1] The charge is a judicial act, framed only after the court has considered the record and heard both sides.

Charge sheet versus charge

The investigating officer recommends; the court decides. A charge sheet may name ten accused under a dozen provisions, and the court may frame charges against six of them under four, discharge the rest, or frame a charge under a section the police did not cite. In Mirza Abbas v The State the High Court Division described the trial court as the sole authority to frame charge against an accused against whom a prima facie case exists.[7]

The accused is entitled, on application, to a copy of the police report before trial, and in cases to which section 170 applies the police must forward the documents and witness statements relied on with the charge sheet.[1] Obtaining that full set early is the foundation of any discharge application.

Where the charge stage sits in a criminal case

In a police case, the sequence runs from FIR and investigation to the charge sheet, cognizance and, where the offence is triable exclusively by the Court of Session, an order under section 205C sending the case to that court with the record and the evidence to be produced.[1] In a complaint case, it runs through examination of the complainant and any inquiry the Magistrate directs. In both, the charge hearing comes next. How a case reaches this point, including final reports and naraji petitions, is covered in our guide to how to file a criminal case in Bangladesh.

The stage matters for three reasons. It is the accused's statutory opportunity to be discharged without trial. It fixes the offences, and therefore the evidence, the sentence range and often the bail position. And the superior courts treat it as the proper forum for arguing that the materials disclose no offence, which is why framing of charges Bangladesh practitioners prepare for carefully tends to shape the whole defence.

The form and content of a charge: sections 221 to 224

Chapter XIX of the Code sets out what a charge must contain. Each rule exists to give the accused fair notice, and errors in them are a recurring ground of challenge.

The offence, the law and the section

Under section 221, every charge must state the offence. Where the law gives the offence a specific name, such as murder or cheating, the name alone may be used; otherwise enough of the definition must be stated to give notice. The law and section must be mentioned, and the charge must be written in English or the language of the court.[1]

Section 221(5) adds that the making of a charge is equivalent to a statement that every legal condition required to constitute the offence was fulfilled. Section 224 gives words in the charge the meaning attached to them by the law under which the offence is punishable.[1]

Time, place, person and manner

Section 222 requires particulars of the time and place of the offence and the person or thing affected, sufficient to give notice. For criminal breach of trust or dishonest misappropriation of money, the charge may state the gross sum and the dates between which the offence occurred, and is treated as one offence, provided the period does not exceed one year.[1] In corporate embezzlement cases spanning several years, that limit may require separate charges.

Where those particulars still do not give sufficient notice, section 223 requires the charge to state the manner of the offence. A theft or murder charge need not describe how the offence was done, but a cheating charge must set out how the victim was cheated, and a false-evidence charge must set out the statement said to be false.[1]

Previous convictions

Where a previous conviction exposes the accused to enhanced punishment and the prosecution intends to prove it, section 221(7) requires its fact, date and place to be stated in the charge. In a Court of Session, section 265L prevents that part of the charge from being read out, pleaded to or referred to until the accused has been convicted on the main charge.[1]

Errors that matter and errors that do not

Defects in a charge rarely end a prosecution on their own. Under section 225, an error or omission in the offence or particulars is material only if the accused was in fact misled and a failure of justice resulted. Section 537 protects findings against errors in the charge and directs the court to consider whether the objection could and should have been raised earlier.[1]

The lesson is to challenge a defective charge when it is framed, not on appeal. Where an appellate or revisional court finds that a convicted person was misled by the absence of, or an error in, a charge, section 232 requires a new trial on a proper charge, or the quashing of the conviction if no valid charge could have been framed on the facts proved.[1]

Discharge before a Magistrate: sections 241A and 242

Chapter XX governs trials before Magistrates, including the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate and the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The charge stage is set out in two short provisions that impose real obligations.

The hearing under section 241A

When the accused appears, the Magistrate must consider the record and the documents submitted with it, may examine the accused, and must give the prosecution and the accused an opportunity of being heard. If the Magistrate considers the charge to be groundless, the Magistrate must discharge the accused and record reasons.[1] The word is "shall". A written section 241A application is the standard vehicle, but the hearing is a statutory right whether or not one is filed.

Framing the charge under section 242

If, after that hearing, the Magistrate considers there is ground for presuming that the accused committed an offence, the Magistrate must frame a formal charge and ask whether the accused admits it.[1] An admission is recorded as nearly as possible in the accused's own words under section 243, and the Magistrate may convict unless sufficient cause is shown; otherwise the case proceeds to evidence under section 244.[1]

Summary trials after the 2026 amendment

Act No XI of 2026 inserted section 264A, which allows framing of charges, recording of evidence, examination of the accused under section 342 and judgment in a summary trial to be completed, where practicable, in the same session and at any place within the court's jurisdiction.[2] In petty matters the gap between charge and judgment can now be hours, and the defence must be ready to argue discharge and contest the evidence on the same day.

Framing of charges Bangladesh Sessions courts conduct: sections 265A to 265F

Chapter XXIII governs trials before Sessions Judges, Additional Sessions Judges and Joint Sessions Judges, and the special tribunals that adopt Sessions procedure. The prosecution is conducted by a Public Prosecutor under section 265A.[1]

Opening of the prosecution case

When the accused appears after the case has been sent under section 205C, section 265B requires the prosecutor to describe the charge and state the evidence by which guilt will be proved.[1] The opening often exposes gaps between the allegations and the evidence actually on record.

The section 265C test: no sufficient ground for proceeding

The court must consider the record and documents, hear both sides, and discharge the accused with reasons if it finds no sufficient ground for proceeding.[1] In Major Md Nazmul Haque v State, arising from the death of a cadet at Mymensingh Girls' Cadet College, the High Court Division held that "no sufficient ground" means the materials do not make out, or are not sufficient to make out, a prima facie case.[5]

The court added that, at this stage, sufficiency is judged on a general consideration of the materials placed by the investigating agency: the truth, veracity and effect of the evidence are not meticulously judged, and the standard applied at the end of trial does not apply.[5]

Framing the charge and taking the plea

If there is ground for presuming that the accused committed an offence, section 265D requires a written charge, read and explained to the accused, who is asked to plead guilty or claim trial. On a guilty plea the court may convict under section 265E; otherwise section 265F requires it to fix a date for prosecution witnesses.[1]

Whose materials count

The most important limit on a section 265C application is that the court looks at the prosecution's materials. In Abdul Kader Patwary v State, the High Court Division recorded as settled that the court considers only the prosecution's materials, not the defence's, and upheld a charge framed on the FIR, charge sheet, inquest and post-mortem reports and the section 161 and 164 statements.[6]

Citing the Appellate Division in Moudud Ahmed v State, the court in Mirza Abbas repeated that a prima facie case on the prosecution's materials justifies framing charge, and that disputed facts belong to trial.[7]

What wins and what loses at the charge hearing

Because the test is confined to the prosecution's record, successful discharge applications are built on what that record does not say. Framing of charges Bangladesh judges conduct is, in substance, a check on whether there is a case worth trying against each accused, on each offence.

• Arguments that work: the FIR, statements and charge sheet, taken at face value, do not disclose the ingredients of the offence; the accused is not named or given any role; the dispute is purely civil; a statutory bar, missing sanction or defective complaint applies; or the offence charged is plainly more serious than the facts allow.
• Arguments that usually fail: the defence version of events, defence documents, alibi evidence, attacks on witness credibility and inconsistencies that only cross-examination can resolve.

In Iman Ali v Most Shimu Begum, the High Court Division upheld a section 265C discharge of nine accused where the police report showed a dower dispute and the complaint followed a dowry case brought against the complainant's family; it noted the complainant had not annexed the witness statements needed to show a prima facie case.[9] In Major Md Nazmul Haque, by contrast, the court left a murder charge resting on a detailed judicial inquiry report to be tested at trial.[5]

A charge is considered accused by accused and offence by offence. Partial discharge, or a charge under a lesser provision than the police recommended, is a common outcome, and a good application gives the court that middle course.

Joinder of charges and joint trials: sections 233 to 240

Section 233 requires a separate charge for every distinct offence and a separate trial of each, except in the cases covered by sections 234, 235, 236 and 239.[1] Joinder affects the length of trial, the evidence heard and the risk of prejudice, and should be argued at the charge stage.

Three offences of the same kind within twelve months

Under section 234, up to three offences of the same kind committed within twelve months from first to last may be charged and tried together, whether or not against the same victim. Offences are of the same kind when punishable with the same punishment under the same section; theft under sections 379 and 380, and an attempt, are deemed to be of the same kind.[1]

The same transaction and overlapping definitions

Under section 235, offences in one series of acts forming the same transaction may be tried together, as may acts falling within two definitions or combining into a different offence, subject to section 71 of the Penal Code.[1] Robbery accompanied by hurt is the classic example.

Alternative charges and minor offences

Where it is doubtful which offence the provable facts constitute, section 236 permits charges for all of them or in the alternative, and section 237 permits conviction for an offence shown in evidence that could have been so charged. Section 238 permits conviction for a minor offence made out by some of the particulars, and for an attempt, but not for an offence requiring a complaint under section 198 or 199 where none was made.[1]

Who may be tried together

Section 239 allows joint trial of, among others, persons accused of the same offence in the same transaction, principals and abettors, persons accused of different offences in the same transaction, and thieves with receivers.[1] Misjoinder is a legitimate objection, but section 537 means it must be raised early and tied to real prejudice. Under section 240, once a conviction is recorded on one head of a multi-head charge, the remaining heads may be withdrawn with the court's consent, operating as an acquittal unless the conviction is set aside.[1]

Altering or adding to a charge: section 227

Section 227 allows any court to alter or add to any charge at any time before judgment, and every alteration must be read and explained to the accused.[1] In Major Md Nazmul Haque the High Court Division relied on this power, noting the trial court could alter the charge if the evidence disclosed an offence under another section.[5]

The safeguards follow. Under sections 228 and 229 the court may proceed at once only if neither side is likely to be prejudiced; otherwise it may order a new trial or adjourn. Under section 230 an altered charge needing sanction cannot proceed until sanction is obtained, unless it was given on the same facts. Under section 231 both sides may recall witnesses already examined and call further material witnesses.[1]

The defence should answer any alteration application in writing, identify the prejudice, seek an adjournment and list the witnesses to be recalled. A late application to add a graver charge without new evidence, allowed without addressing prejudice, is worth taking to the revisional court.

Challenging an order framing charge or refusing discharge

No appeal lies against an order framing charge. The summary below shows how the remedies fit together; the detail is in our guides to criminal revision in Bangladesh and section 561A quashment in Bangladesh, which this article does not repeat.

Seek discharge first

In Mohammad Amir Ali Mostafa v Shah Md Nurul Alam, the Appellate Division set aside a quashing order where the accused had neither been charged nor applied for discharge under section 241A, observing that they had to exhaust the procedures available to them first.[4]

Revision

Under section 435, the High Court Division or a Sessions Judge may examine any order of an inferior criminal court for correctness, legality or propriety, and under section 439A a Sessions Judge's decision on a person's revision application is final as to that person.[1] A Magistrate's charge-framing order is therefore commonly taken first to the Sessions Judge. An order of a Court of Session goes to the High Court Division, which interferes only to correct a manifest illegality or prevent a gross miscarriage of justice.[5]

In a 2023 case brought by Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, a charge framed by an Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate after rejection of a section 241A application was challenged before the Metropolitan Sessions Judge and then under section 561A; the High Court Division rejected the application summarily, finding prima facie allegations and compliance with sections 221 to 223.[8]

Section 561A, special courts and complainants

Section 561A preserves the High Court Division's inherent power to prevent abuse of process or secure the ends of justice.[1] In Noor Ahmed v State it set aside a Sessions Judge's charge-framing order against a petitioner not named in the FIR, finding no prospect of a successful prosecution.[10] Special courts may have their own route: in Mirza Abbas a Special Judge's charge in an Anti-Corruption Commission case was challenged under section 10(1A) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 1958.[7]

Complainants may revise a discharge, as in Iman Ali, and under section 436 the revisional court may direct further inquiry into a discharged accused's case after giving that person a chance to show cause.[1] [9]

Stays and the cost of delay

Stays of trial pending revision are often granted, but when the Rule is discharged the stay is vacated, sometimes with a direction for early disposal, as in Mirza Abbas.[7] A weak challenge buys time, not an outcome. After conviction, defects in the charge can still be raised on appeal, subject to sections 225, 232 and 537; see our guide to criminal appeals in Bangladesh.

Timelines: from charge sheet to charge, and from charge to judgment

The Code fixes no deadline for the charge hearing itself, but the stages either side of framing of charges Bangladesh law regulates carry statutory clocks.

• Investigation: section 173B requires investigation within sixty working days of receipt of the information, extendable by the Magistrate, who may transfer the investigation if the extended time is missed.[2]
• Trial: section 339C requires a Magistrate to conclude a trial within 180 days, and a Sessions court within 360 days, of receiving the case for trial; periods for several cases against one accused run consecutively, and transfer does not restart the clock.[1]
• Bail on delay: under section 339C(4), an accused of a non-bailable offence may be bailed if the deadline is missed, unless the court records reasons otherwise.[1] See our guide to bail law and criminal defence in Bangladesh.

Practice varies widely. In a child rape and murder case from Pallabi, Dhaka, police submitted the charge sheet on 24 May 2026, the Dhaka Metropolitan tribunal for violence against children framed charges on 1 June 2026, and testimony was fixed for the next day.[11] [12] Ordinary cases can wait far longer. In the Supreme Court, pending cases fell from about 700,800 at the start of 2026 to 685,830 by 31 August 2026.[13]

What the 2026 amendment means for framing of charges Bangladesh courts conduct

Parliament passed the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Bill 2026 on 7 April 2026, moved by the Law Minister, Md Asaduzzaman, as part of a package converting interim-government ordinances into law.[3] Act No XI of 2026, dated 10 April 2026, repealed the two 2025 amending ordinances, saved action taken under them, and is deemed effective from 10 August 2025, with one provision from 10 July 2025.[2]

What did not change

The Act does not amend sections 221 to 240, section 241A, section 242 or sections 265A to 265L. The discharge and framing tests, content rules, joinder rules and alteration power are unchanged, as are the revisional provisions and section 561A.[2]

What changed around the charge stage

• Discharge during investigation: section 173A lets a supervising officer call for an interim report and, if it shows insufficient evidence against an accused, send it to the Magistrate, who may discharge that accused while investigation continues; the person may still be charge-sheeted if substantive evidence later emerges.[2]
• Accused treated as witness: under section 173B(6), on submission of the investigation report the court may direct that a named accused be treated as a witness.[2]
• Summary trials: section 264A allows charge to judgment in one session.[2]
• Attendance: amended section 540A lets the court dispense with the attendance of a represented accused on bail during investigation.[2]
• False cases: amended section 250 now obliges a Magistrate who discharges or acquits on an accusation found false and either frivolous or vexatious to call on the complainant or informant to show cause why compensation should not be paid, with higher limits.[2]
• Compounding: new section 345(8) lets the court facilitate compounding, including by referral to the legal aid officer.[2]

The charge hearing is therefore no longer the only filter. An uninvolved accused may be released during investigation or turned into a witness, and a complainant whose case fails at charge before a Magistrate faces mandatory compensation proceedings.

Step-by-step: preparing for the charge hearing

Whether you act for the accused or the complainant, the work that decides the hearing is done before it. This is the sequence we follow.

Swipe or scroll →

Keep the order sheet under review throughout. Disputes about whether a section 241A or section 265C hearing actually took place are often settled by what the order sheet records.

Magistrate and Sessions charge stages compared

The two procedures share a structure but differ in wording, forum and route of challenge. On a phone, scroll the table sideways.

Common mistakes in framing of charges Bangladesh practice

• Treating the hearing as a formality: discharge is mandatory where the test is met.
• Arguing the defence case: applications built on defence documents or alibi fail, because the court considers only the prosecution's materials.[6]
• Skipping discharge: going straight to section 561A without a section 241A or section 265C application invites dismissal as premature.[4]
• Ignoring the content of the charge: a charge lacking the section, particulars or manner should be objected to at once, because sections 225 and 537 weigh against late objections.[1]
• Accepting misjoinder: more than three same-kind offences, or unconnected transactions, should be challenged before evidence starts.
• Complainants under-preparing: a complainant opposing or revising a discharge must put the witness statements before the court.[9]
• Overlooking the 2026 tools: sections 173A and 173B(6) can resolve a client's position before charge is reached.[2]

Practical strategy for 2026

For an accused, the strategy is to win on the record: obtain the full charge sheet and annexures, test every ingredient of every offence against the prosecution's own statements, ask for discharge or a lesser charge accused by accused, and make sure the order records what was argued. If charge is framed, decide quickly whether there is a genuine legal error for revision or an abuse of process for section 561A; if not, prepare for trial with section 339C in mind.

For complainants and corporate victims, the strategy is to make the prima facie case obvious, map evidence to ingredients, and ask for charges under the right provisions with proper particulars, so that a conviction is not later lost under section 232. Framing of charges Bangladesh courts get right first time is the cheapest protection against a retrial.

TRW's criminal quashment and revision practice advises on discharge applications, charge hearings, revisions and section 561A applications. For the wider framework, see our overview of criminal law in Bangladesh, or contact TRW before the charge hearing date is fixed.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between a charge sheet and a charge in Bangladesh?

A charge sheet is the police report submitted under section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure after investigation. A charge is the court's own written accusation, framed under section 242 or 265D after hearing both sides, which the accused must answer at trial.[1]

When can an accused be discharged before charge is framed?

A Magistrate must discharge the accused if the charge is groundless under section 241A; a Court of Session must discharge if there is no sufficient ground for proceeding under section 265C. Reasons must be recorded in both cases.[1]

Can the defence rely on its own documents at the charge hearing?

Generally not. The High Court Division treats it as settled that the court considers only the prosecution's materials when framing charge and leaves disputed facts to trial.[6] [7]

What must a charge contain?

The offence, the law and section, and particulars of time, place and the person or thing affected sufficient to give notice. Where those are not enough, as in cheating or false evidence, the manner of the offence must also be stated.[1]

Can a charge be changed during trial?

Yes. Under section 227 any court may alter or add to a charge before judgment. The court may adjourn or order a new trial to avoid prejudice, and witnesses may be recalled under section 231.[1]

How many offences can be tried together against one accused?

Each distinct offence normally needs a separate charge and trial, but up to three offences of the same kind within twelve months may be tried together, and offences forming the same transaction may be joined without that limit.[1]

Can I appeal against an order framing charge?

No appeal lies. The order can be challenged in revision before the Sessions Judge or the High Court Division and, in exceptional cases, under section 561A, usually only after a discharge application has failed.[4] [8]

Can a complainant challenge an order discharging the accused?

Yes, by revision. The revisional court may also direct further inquiry into a discharged accused's case under section 436, after giving that person an opportunity to show cause.[1] [9]

How long does a criminal trial take after charge is framed?

Section 339C requires a Magistrate to conclude a trial within 180 days and a Sessions court within 360 days of receiving the case. If the deadline is missed, an accused of a non-bailable offence may be bailed unless the court records reasons otherwise.[1]

Did the 2026 amendment change framing of charges in Bangladesh?

Not directly. Act No XI of 2026 left sections 221 to 240, 241A, 242 and 265A to 265L unchanged, but added interim-report discharge under section 173A, the accused-as-witness power in section 173B(6) and same-session summary trials under section 264A.[2]