TRW Insight / Trade
Bangladesh's first economic partnership agreement was signed with Japan in February 2026 and is designed to protect duty-free access after LDC graduation. Its value depends on entry into force, origin compliance and how investors use it alongside the 1998 investment treaty.
Japan Bangladesh EPA: status and timeline in 2026
The Japan Bangladesh EPA is the first comprehensive economic partnership agreement Bangladesh has ever signed, and it arrives at the moment the country's least developed country preferences are due to start falling away. Signed in Tokyo on 6 February 2026 after two years of negotiation, the agreement covers far more than tariffs: it sets rules on origin, customs, services, investment, electronic commerce, government procurement, intellectual property, labour and the environment.[1] [2] [4]
For Bangladeshi exporters it is the instrument intended to keep garments and thousands of other products duty-free in Japan once LDC graduation takes effect. For Japanese investors it is a new layer of legal commitments on top of a bilateral investment treaty that has been in force since 1999. This briefing sets out where the agreement stands in October 2026, what it actually contains, how to claim its preferences, how investment protection and disputes work, and the compliance traps that will decide who benefits.

Summary: The Japan-Bangladesh Economic Partnership Agreement was signed on 6 February 2026 but, on the latest reporting, had not entered into force by October 2026. Once in force, Japan grants immediate duty-free access to 7,379 Bangladeshi products, including garments under a single-stage transformation rule, while Bangladesh liberalises 1,039 Japanese products, mostly over 18 years. Until then, Japan's GSP and its post-graduation LDC extension remain the operative regimes.
Key point: Signature is not entry into force. Until both governments complete their domestic procedures and notify each other, no exporter can claim an EPA preference, and the agreement's investment and services commitments do not bind either state. Plan shipments and contracts against the regime that actually applies on the date of import.
At a glance
Status
Negotiations launched 12 March 2024; agreement in principle 22 December 2025; signed in Tokyo on 6 February 2026; not yet in force in October 2026.
Goods
7,379 Bangladeshi products duty-free in Japan from day one; 1,039 Japanese products liberalised by Bangladesh, mostly over 18 years.
Garments
Single-stage transformation rule lets apparel made from imported fabric qualify for zero duty.
Scope
Twenty-two chapters, including services, investment, e-commerce, government procurement, IP, labour, environment and dispute settlement.
Investment
The 1998 Japan-Bangladesh investment agreement, with ICSID arbitration, remains the established treaty protection for Japanese investors.
Table of Contents
Japan Bangladesh EPA: status and timeline in 2026
The agreement's formal title is the Agreement between Japan and the People's Republic of Bangladesh for an Economic Partnership. Japan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs records the full sequence: a Joint Study Group launched on 12 December 2022, formal negotiations launched on 12 March 2024, a series of negotiating rounds through 2024 and 2025 ending with a seventh round in September 2025, an agreement in principle on 22 December 2025 and signature on 6 February 2026.[1] The agreement was signed in Tokyo by Japan's State Minister for Foreign Affairs, Horii Iwao, and by Sheikh Bashir Uddin, then Adviser for Commerce in the interim government of Bangladesh.[2]
Bangladeshi reporting adds the detail of the rounds. The first was held in Dhaka in May 2024 and the seventh, the final round, in Tokyo from 3 to 12 September 2025, when the draft was essentially settled.[5] Both governments described the deal as Bangladesh's first full economic partnership agreement. Its only earlier preferential arrangement was a narrower trade agreement with Bhutan signed in December 2020.[6]
Signed, but not yet in force
Signature fixes the text; it does not create enforceable rights. When the draft was finalised in December 2025, the final text was to go to Japan's Diet and to Bangladesh's then advisory council for approval.[6] Reporting in mid-October 2026 stated that the agreement was still not in force, that Japan was seeking ratification during the current parliamentary session, and that entry into force was expected in the first half of 2027, once both countries had completed their domestic legal procedures and notified each other.[10] Bangladesh's government changed after the February 2026 election, so its own approval process now sits with the elected administration.
The practical message is simple. Until an entry-into-force date is published, the Japan Bangladesh EPA is a planning document. Exporters continue to ship under Japan's generalised system of preferences, and investors continue to rely on the 1998 investment treaty and Bangladeshi domestic law.
What the Japan Bangladesh EPA covers
The signed text runs to twenty-two chapters: general provisions; trade in goods; rules of origin; customs procedures and trade facilitation; sanitary and phytosanitary measures; technical regulations, standards and conformity assessment; trade in services; movement of natural persons; investment; electronic commerce; government procurement; intellectual property; competition policy; subsidies; state-owned enterprises and designated monopolies; improvement of the business environment; labour; environment; transparency; cooperation; dispute settlement; and final provisions.[4]
That breadth matters. Bangladesh's earlier trade arrangements were essentially tariff instruments. This agreement adds rule-making chapters that will shape regulatory behaviour, especially on customs, procurement, state-owned enterprises and subsidies. A Joint Committee administers the agreement and adopts, among other things, the rules of procedure for arbitration between the two states.[4]
Market access for goods
The headline numbers are asymmetric by design. Japan will give duty-free access to 7,379 Bangladeshi products from the first day the agreement applies, covering roughly 97 per cent of Bangladesh's export basket to Japan. Bangladesh will give duty-free treatment to 1,039 Japanese products, with most of its tariff cuts phased in over 18 years.[6] [7] Bangladesh's commerce officials estimated the annual revenue cost of its concessions at less than Tk 20 crore.[7]
For Japanese manufacturers sourcing inputs into Bangladesh, the long phase-in means the tariff schedule for each specific HS line, not the headline figure, determines the real saving in any given year.
Services and movement of people
On services, Bangladesh committed to open 97 sub-sectors to Japan, while Japan opened 120 sub-sectors to Bangladesh across the four modes of supply.[5] [6] Bangladesh's commerce ministry also highlighted access to the Japanese labour market for skilled workers, including doctors, nurses and caregivers, under the movement-of-natural-persons chapter.[7] Service suppliers should check the schedules line by line: a sub-sector listed as open may still carry nationality, licensing or local-presence conditions.
Rule-making chapters
The customs chapter commits both administrations to advance rulings, risk management, expedited treatment of express consignments, post-clearance audit and time-release studies, with a right of appeal and review against customs decisions.[4] It builds on a separate customs cooperation and mutual assistance agreement the two countries signed in Tokyo on 26 April 2023.[4] Separate chapters address government procurement, competition, subsidies and state-owned enterprises, which are areas where Bangladesh has not previously taken bilateral treaty commitments.

Garments, rules of origin and the single-stage advantage under the Japan Bangladesh EPA
For Bangladesh, garments are the centre of the agreement. Ready-made garments are to enter Japan duty-free from the first day of implementation.[5] [6] Just as important, the agreement's rules of origin allow single-stage transformation for apparel, so a garment cut and sewn in Bangladesh from imported fabric can still qualify for zero duty.[6] [7] The garment manufacturers' association, BGMEA, describes the relevant provisions as sitting in Chapter 3 and Annex 2 and as broadly mirroring the rule under Japan's current GSP.[8]
The value of that rule is clearest by comparison. Without a preference, BGMEA estimates that Bangladeshi knitwear would face Japanese MFN duties of roughly 8 to 15 per cent and woven garments 10 per cent or more.[8] A single-stage rule keeps a supply chain built on imported fabric commercially viable, which is why exporters regard it as the most valuable concession in the agreement.
How proof of origin works
Chapter 3 sets out the rules of origin and provides several routes to prove origin. A certificate of origin may be issued by the exporting party's competent governmental authority or its designees on the exporter's request, in a common English-language format. A declaration of origin may be completed by an approved exporter authorised by the exporting party, and the agreement contemplates declarations by importers, exporters or producers. Japan may accept importer declarations from entry into force, while other forms of self-declaration apply only from a date the parties fix later.[4]
A proof of origin is generally valid for one year from issue or completion, and records supporting the origin claim must be kept for at least five years.[4] The chapter also provides for verification by the importing party and for denial of preferential treatment where origin cannot be substantiated. In practice this means the origin file, not the certificate, is what protects the preference: bills of materials, supplier declarations, production records and shipping documents need to be kept in a form that survives a verification request years later.
Bilateral safeguards
The goods chapter includes a bilateral safeguard. Where increased imports of an originating good cause or threaten serious injury to a domestic industry, the importing party may suspend further tariff reductions or raise the duty, but not above the applicable MFN rate. Investigations should normally finish within one year and never exceed 18 months; measures last up to three years, extendable to six only in highly exceptional circumstances; provisional measures may not exceed 200 days; compensation is expected; and the same good cannot be hit by a bilateral and a WTO safeguard at once.[4] Sensitive exporters should treat this as a live risk once volumes rise sharply.
Japan Bangladesh EPA and LDC graduation
The timing of the agreement is no accident. LDC graduation is scheduled for 24 November 2026, when Bangladesh is due to leave the least developed country category, and the joint study that preceded negotiations warned that graduation could end the country's existing duty-free benefits in Japan.[5] In February 2026 the government asked the United Nations for a three-year extension of the preparatory period. On 21 July 2026 the UN Economic and Social Council passed that request to the General Assembly, recommending a final decision before 24 November 2026.[3]
Japan's own transition for graduating LDCs
Japan has already softened the cliff edge. An amendment to Article 8-2(3) of Japan's Temporary Tariff Measures Law allows a country to keep LDC preferential treatment for up to three years after it graduates. Japan notified the WTO in November 2025, and on the scheduled timetable Bangladesh's Japanese LDC preferences would therefore run to around November 2029.[9] Once that window closes, apparel would face Japan's ordinary GSP or MFN rates, which reporting at the time put at 9 per cent for garments under the post-LDC status.[9]
That sequencing defines the commercial value of the agreement. Until LDC graduation takes full effect the EPA largely duplicates preferences Bangladesh already enjoys. Its real value begins when the LDC transition ends, because an EPA preference does not depend on development status and cannot be withdrawn unilaterally the way a GSP benefit can. For long-term supply contracts with Japanese buyers, the Japan Bangladesh EPA is the more durable basis for pricing. Our analysis of the WTO's impact on Bangladesh trade explains the wider graduation picture.
Choosing between EPA and GSP preferences
Once both regimes are available, importers in Japan will usually be able to claim whichever preference applies to the shipment, provided the origin rules of that regime are met. Before graduation and during the transition, the GSP route may be simpler for some products. After the post-LDC graduation transition, only the EPA route will deliver zero duty for most goods, so exporters should not wait for the GSP window to close before testing their compliance with the EPA rules of origin. Exporters should prepare documentation that satisfies the EPA rules now, so the switch does not interrupt supply.

Opportunities for Japanese investors
Japanese investment in Bangladesh has been modest relative to Japan's aid relationship. The Economic Relations Division put cumulative Japanese FDI from 2020 to 30 September 2025 at US$469.6 million, while Japanese committed loans to Bangladesh had reached US$32.32 billion by FY2023-24.[5] Bangladesh's investment authority said at the time of the draft's finalisation that the absence of a formal trade framework had long been a concern for Japanese investors.[6] The agreement is designed to change that calculation for Japanese investors weighing Bangladesh against other Asian production bases ahead of LDC graduation.
The trade flows give a sense of scale. In FY2024-25 Bangladesh imported goods worth about US$1.87 billion from Japan and exported about US$1.41 billion, according to Bangladesh Bank data.[5] For Japanese investors, the combination of phased tariff cuts on Japanese inputs, zero duty on finished goods shipped back to Japan and new rules on services and investment supports export-oriented manufacturing in Bangladesh.
The Japanese Economic Zone at Araihazar
The flagship location is the Bangladesh Special Economic Zone at Araihazar in Narayanganj, about 32 km north-east of Dhaka, a roughly 1,000-acre zone developed by Sumitomo Corporation in collaboration between the two governments. BIDA promotes it as the first economic zone with customs inside the zone, with bonded facilities, utilities, effluent treatment and a one-stop service centre offering BEZA's online services.[13]
Investors should also understand the zone's governance debate. In December 2025 The Business Standard reported that the operating company is 76 per cent owned by Sumitomo and 24 per cent by BEZA, and that the Economic Relations Division had written on 14 October 2025 questioning that structure and opposing further expansion pending review; BEZA's former leadership defended the arrangement.[14] None of this affects an existing tenant's lease directly, but it can affect expansion timetables and infrastructure funding, which belong in any investment due diligence. Our guide to economic zone leases in Bangladesh covers lender step-in, assignment and utility terms.
Registering the investment
The EPA does not replace Bangladesh's domestic approvals. Japanese investors still need company or branch registration, investment registration with the competent authority, foreign exchange compliance for capital inflows and repatriation, and sector licences. The Invest Bangladesh Act 2026 has reorganised the investment agencies, and our foreign investment and registration practice advises on sequencing these approvals.
Investment protection: the EPA and the 1998 treaty
Chapter 9 of the agreement is a full investment chapter of 22 articles.[4] Until the agreement enters into force, however, the operative treaty protection for Japanese investors remains the Agreement between Japan and the People's Republic of Bangladesh concerning the Promotion and Protection of Investment, signed in Tokyo on 10 November 1998 and in force since 25 August 1999.[11] [12]
Key features of the 1998 treaty
Under Article 10 of the 1998 treaty, investment disputes are first to be settled amicably through consultation. If that fails, the host state consents to conciliation or arbitration under the ICSID Convention at the investor's request. There is a fork in the road: an investor that has taken the dispute to the host state's administrative or judicial bodies cannot then submit it to arbitration under Article 10, nor after a final judicial settlement. A locally incorporated company controlled by investors of the other state may be treated as a company of that state for this purpose. State-to-state disputes go to a three-member arbitral board.[11]
The treaty ran for an initial ten years and continues until either state gives one year's written notice; investments made before termination remain protected for a further fifteen years.[11] The fork-in-the-road clause is the single biggest trap. A Japanese investor that files a writ petition in the High Court Division over a regulatory decision may lose the treaty route for the same dispute, so the forum choice must be made with both routes in view.
How the two instruments will interact
Once the EPA is in force, investors will need to read its investment chapter alongside the 1998 treaty, including any provision on the relationship between the two. Until the operative text and any implementing guidance are confirmed, the prudent course is to structure Japanese holdings so that they qualify under both instruments, keep investment records that evidence the investor's nationality and the date and form of each investment, and avoid steps in domestic litigation that could foreclose treaty arbitration. For Japanese investors, our investment treaty arbitration practice and the guide to ICSID arbitration involving Bangladesh explain the mechanics.
Contracts, pricing and the Japan Bangladesh EPA
A preference is only worth what the contract says it is worth. Long-term supply agreements with Japanese buyers that run beyond LDC graduation should state which preference regime the parties expect to use, who bears the duty if a preference is denied, and who is responsible for producing and keeping the origin documents. Where the price assumes zero duty in Japan, the contract should say so expressly and provide a mechanism for adjusting price if the duty position changes.
For Japanese investors manufacturing in Bangladesh, the same discipline applies upstream. Supply contracts for fabric, components and machinery should require suppliers to provide the declarations needed to satisfy the rules of origin, to cooperate with verification requests and to notify changes in the origin of their own inputs. A single non-compliant input can disqualify an entire shipment where the product-specific rule depends on where that input was made.
Warranties and indemnities on origin
Origin warranties are now standard in Japanese procurement contracts with suppliers in partner countries, and Bangladeshi exporters should expect them. A sensible warranty is limited to facts within the exporter's control, ties liability to duty and penalties actually assessed, and preserves the right to contest a customs decision before paying out. Exporters should resist open-ended indemnities for consequential loss arising from a denied preference.
Dispute clauses
Because the Japan Bangladesh EPA does not give private parties a direct remedy for commercial disputes, buyer and supplier contracts need their own dispute resolution clause. Arbitration seated in a neutral venue, or in Dhaka or Tokyo under institutional rules, is common for cross-border supply chains. Our guide to international trade law in Bangladesh sets out the domestic rules that sit behind these contracts.
Dispute settlement under the agreement
Chapter 21 of the agreement provides state-to-state dispute settlement, with arbitration conducted under rules of procedure adopted by the Joint Committee.[4] Private parties cannot bring these cases themselves. An exporter facing an unjustified denial of preference, or a service supplier blocked contrary to a scheduled commitment, must persuade its own government to raise the matter, usually first through the relevant sub-committee or consultations.
Not every chapter is subject to that mechanism. The sanitary and phytosanitary chapter, for example, expressly disapplies Chapter 21, so each chapter's final articles must be checked before a dispute is framed.[4] Businesses should therefore build their own remedies into their contracts and domestic procedures: customs appeals under Bangladeshi and Japanese law, advance rulings to settle classification and origin before shipment, and commercial arbitration clauses for buyer and supplier disputes. Our WTO and trade dispute practice handles government-to-government advocacy and customs challenges.
How to use the Japan Bangladesh EPA: step by step
The following sequence is how we prepare exporters and investors to claim the agreement's benefits on the day it enters into force.
Confirm the applicable regime
Check whether the EPA has entered into force on the date of import and, until then, ship under Japan's GSP or LDC preferences.
Classify every product
Fix the HS code for each export and input, and use advance rulings where classification is uncertain.
Read the product-specific rule
Confirm the origin rule and tariff schedule for each line in Chapter 3, Annex 1 and Annex 2 rather than relying on headline figures.
Build the origin file
Collect bills of materials, supplier declarations, production records and shipping documents, and keep them for at least five years.
Obtain proof of origin
Apply to the competent authority for a certificate of origin, or qualify as an approved exporter where declarations are permitted.
Update contracts
Allocate duty savings, origin warranties, documentation duties and the risk of denied preference in buyer and supplier contracts.
Structure the investment
Hold Japanese investments so they qualify for treaty protection and preserve the option of ICSID arbitration.
Monitor and respond
Track safeguard investigations, verification requests and implementing rules, and escalate problems through customs appeals or government channels.
Two disciplines run through every step. Keep the origin file complete for at least the five-year record period, and treat each tariff line and services commitment as a separate legal question rather than relying on headline summaries.
Comparing the preference regimes
The table below compares the main regimes affecting Bangladeshi exports to Japan. On a phone, scroll it sideways.
| Regime | Legal basis | Status in October 2026 | Garment origin rule | Key point |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Japan LDC preferences | Temporary Tariff Measures Law | Applies now | Single-stage, per BGMEA | Available while Bangladesh is an LDC |
| Post-graduation LDC extension | Art 8-2(3), Temporary Tariff Measures Law | Notified to WTO November 2025 | As under LDC preferences | Up to three years after graduation |
| Japan Bangladesh EPA | Bilateral treaty signed 6 February 2026 | Signed, not yet in force | Single-stage transformation | Permanent, negotiated preference |
| MFN tariffs | WTO schedules | Applies without a preference | Not applicable | Roughly 8 to 15 per cent on many garments |
The key institutions involved in claiming and policing these preferences are set out below.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan
Lead negotiator and depositary of the official EPA text and the 1998 investment agreement.
Ministry of Commerce
Signed for Bangladesh and coordinates implementation, schedules and trade negotiations.
National Board of Revenue and Japan Customs
Apply the tariff schedules, origin rules, advance rulings and verification procedures.
BIDA and BEZA
Register foreign investment and administer economic zones, including the Araihazar zone.
Bangladesh Special Economic Zone
Sumitomo-developed Japanese Economic Zone at Araihazar, Narayanganj.
BGMEA
Garment manufacturers' association guiding exporters on the EPA's apparel rules.

Compliance traps to avoid
- Claiming before entry into force: an EPA preference claimed on a shipment imported before the agreement applies will be refused.
- Assuming every garment qualifies: the single-stage rule is one of several product-specific rules of origin; check the product-specific rule for each HS line, especially accessories and made-up textiles.
- Weak origin files: a certificate does not survive verification if supplier and production records are missing; keep them for at least five years.[4]
- Stale proofs of origin: a proof of origin generally lapses one year after issue or completion.[4]
- Reading the headline tariff figure as the schedule: Bangladesh's cuts on many Japanese goods phase in over up to 18 years.[6]
- Losing treaty protection by forum choice: domestic litigation can trigger the 1998 treaty's fork-in-the-road clause.[11]
- Ignoring safeguards: a rapid surge in exports of one product can prompt a bilateral safeguard investigation.[4]
- Forgetting domestic law: the agreement does not replace Bangladeshi investment, foreign exchange, customs or sector licensing requirements.
What to watch in 2026 and 2027
Four developments will shape the value of the Japan Bangladesh EPA over the next year, and each matters to exporters and Japanese investors alike. First, the ratification process in both capitals and the publication of an entry-into-force date. Second, the General Assembly's decision on Bangladesh's request to extend its LDC preparatory period, which will move the date on which Japan's three-year GSP extension starts to run.[3] [9] Third, the implementing rules each customs administration will issue on certificates and declarations of origin. Fourth, any decisions on the second phase of the Araihazar zone.[14]
Bangladesh is also negotiating with other partners, and BGMEA has described the Japanese agreement as a possible model for future deals.[8] Our overview of Bangladesh's trade agreements tracks those negotiations. For advice on origin planning, investment structuring or disputes under the agreement, contact TRW in Dhaka.
Frequently asked questions
When was the Japan Bangladesh EPA signed?
Is the agreement in force?
Not on the latest reporting. In mid-October 2026 the agreement was still awaiting completion of domestic procedures, with entry into force expected in the first half of 2027.[10]
How many products get duty-free access?
Do Bangladeshi garments made from imported fabric qualify?
How is origin proved under the agreement's rules of origin?
By a certificate of origin issued by the exporting party's competent authority or its designees, or by a declaration of origin where the agreement allows it, including declarations by approved exporters. Proofs are generally valid for one year and records must be kept for five years.[4]
What happens to Japan's LDC preferences after LDC graduation?
Japan's amended Temporary Tariff Measures Law allows LDC preferences to continue for up to three years after graduation, which on the scheduled timetable runs to about November 2029.[9]
Does the agreement cover services and investment?
Is there already an investment treaty between Japan and Bangladesh?
Can a company sue a government under the EPA?
Where is the Japanese Economic Zone in Bangladesh?
At Araihazar in Narayanganj, about 32 km north-east of Dhaka. The roughly 1,000-acre Bangladesh Special Economic Zone is developed by Sumitomo Corporation and has customs inside the zone.[13]
Source register
Primary legal and regulatory sources
Materials checked on 23 October 2026. Confirm the current official text before relying on any provision.
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan — Japan-Bangladesh EPA page (timeline)
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 6 February 2026 — Signing of the Japan-Bangladesh EPA
- The Daily Star, 23 July 2026 — LDC graduation deferral awaits UNGA nod
- Agreement between Japan and the People's Republic of Bangladesh for an Economic Partnership (official text)
- Dhaka Tribune, February 2026 — Bangladesh signs first EPA with Japan
- The Daily Star, 22 December 2025 — Bangladesh, Japan finalise draft EPA
- The Daily Star, February 2026 — Japan EPA to cost Bangladesh Tk 20cr annually
- BGMEA, 6 February 2026 — The Japan-Bangladesh EPA and the awaited US-Bangladesh trade deal
- The Financial Express, 11 November 2025 — Bangladesh to get duty-free access to Japan market for 3 years after graduation
- Daily Waadaa, 18 October 2026 — Japan moves to counter China's influence in Bangladesh with landmark trade deal
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan — Japan-Bangladesh Agreement concerning the Promotion and Protection of Investment (1998), treaty text
- Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan — International Investment Agreements (signature and entry-into-force dates)
- BIDA Investment Summit — Bangladesh Special Economic Zone (BSEZ), Araihazar
- The Business Standard, 8 December 2025 — Sumitomo's majority stake in Japanese economic zone against national interest: ERD
Related TRW assistance
Move from information to a defined next step
TRW advises exporters and Japanese investors on origin compliance, preference planning, investment structuring and trade and treaty disputes. Explore our international trade practice and investment treaty arbitration practice, or contact TRW in Dhaka.











